Evaluate payment paths by cost, settlement time, and route structure
Corridor-level routing output with live FX input, modeled path economics, and route intelligence across Keeta, hybrid, card, and legacy rails.
Optimized for cost and settlement time.
Selected because it combines lower modeled cost, faster settlement, and a simpler route structure than the alternatives.
If destination anchor coverage is incomplete, settlement can revert to an external completion layer, increasing cost and settlement time.
Fewer layers, direct settlement model, and highest route transparency.
Keeta vs hybrid, card, and legacy rails across sample send sizes. Lower is better.
Sample send amounts with modeled fee, spread, and settlement assumptions.
Selected because it combines lower modeled cost, faster settlement, and a simpler route structure than the alternatives.
If destination anchor coverage is incomplete, settlement can revert to an external completion layer, increasing cost and settlement time.
Not selected because the USD to EUR path still carries external completion cost and added route complexity versus the leading option.
External completion introduces extra delay or added fee drag before destination funds are credited.
Not selected because card network payout adds a higher fee and wider spread profile than the leading route for this scenario.
Payout is rejected by the receiving card network or endpoint and must be retried or rerouted.
Not selected because correspondent banking introduces more intermediary layers, slower settlement, and the highest modeled leakage.
Funds are delayed across correspondent hops and the final credited amount can absorb wider intermediary FX spread.